Dakar, 23 June 2026
'We're not dead.'
Pape Thiaw's words after the defeat against Norway look more like a message of unity than a cold-headed analysis of the situation. Yet, on paper, Senegal is still breathing.
In this 48-team World Cup, the eight best third-placed sides advance to the round of sixteen. Despite the defeats against France (1-3) and then Norway (2-3), the Lions have kept a door ajar. A narrow door — very narrow — but a door nonetheless.
To walk through it, Senegal will need to pull off a feat on Friday in Toronto against Iraq, while hoping for a series of favourable results on other pitches. In other words: the Lions no longer have their fate in their own hands.
Anatomy of a shipwreck: why Senegal lost its balance
Before reaching for the calculators, one question demands an answer: how has this generation, considered one of the most talented in the history of Senegalese football, found itself on the brink of elimination after just two matchdays?
Criticism naturally converges on Pape Thiaw — not solely because of the results, but because several bold decisions made by the head coach are now being called into question.
The Koulibaly gamble
The first concerns Kalidou Koulibaly. By relying on his captain when the player had only just returned from injury, the staff took a significant risk. Lacking match sharpness at certain points, the central defender appeared in difficulty in several fast-transition situations, both against the French and the Norwegians.
Reducing Senegal's difficulties to Koulibaly's case alone would, however, be a mistake. The real problem is collective.
A block that stretches, spaces that open up
Against France and then Norway, Senegal often gave the impression of controlling certain spells before gradually losing their grip on events. The Lions produced play, won the ball high up the pitch and managed to pin their opponents back — but without converting enough of their chances.
Failing to turn their strong spells into goals, Senegal found themselves chasing the game. Then forcing their fate. Then exposing themselves. From that moment on, the team gradually fell apart:
- The full-backs took greater risks.
- The midfielders pushed further forward.
- The distances between the lines grew.
- The block stretched, and every loss of possession became a threat.
Idrissa Gana Gueye and Pape Gueye struggled less in terms of game organisation than in the repetition of defensive transitions. As the matches wore on, the spaces to cover grew larger and the recovery runs longer. France exploited those gaping corridors in behind the defence. Norway did likewise. In modern football, teams with quick forwards live precisely for these kinds of scenarios.
Attacking leaders in search of influence
Lamine Camara has not yet managed to impose the tempo that was his trademark in previous competitions. As for Sadio Mané, he is for the moment struggling to rediscover the impact that made him the Lions' primary source of imbalance at major tournaments.
Senegal still possesses talent. But they can no longer convert that talent into collective control. And in a World Cup, that is something you pay for immediately.
The three conditions to survive
Step 1: beat Iraq
The first condition is unequivocal: Senegal must beat Iraq. Any other result would definitively eliminate the Lions. A win would allow Pape Thiaw's men to finish on three points and provisionally settle into third place in Group I.
Step 2: win by a big margin
The real problem is called goal difference. After two matchdays, Senegal's record stands at -3. In a race where several third-placed sides will likely finish on three points, this indicator could become decisive.
A narrow win might count for nothing. A 3-0 victory would, for example, bring their goal difference back to zero — probably the bare minimum to stay in the race. Senegal therefore no longer just needs to win: they need to convince.
Step 3: keep an eye on other groups
Even by beating Iraq, Senegal will depend heavily on results in other groups. The objective is to finish ahead of at least four other third-placed sides. The most favourable scenarios: In Group B, a draw between Bosnia-Herzegovina and Qatar would leave the third-placed side on just two points. In Group E, a share of the spoils between Ecuador and Curaçao would limit the damage for the Lions. In Groups G and H, an upset involving Iran or Cape Verde could open the door further for Pape Thiaw's men. The goal-average battles to watch: Scotland vs Brazil Sweden vs Japan South Korea vs Mexico Paraguay vs Turkey Algeria vs Austria









Comments
By posting, you agree to our privacy policy.